This question is suggested by that about L^p multipliers (and the answer by Michael Lacey in particular).
Let E be a measurable set in the plane and XiE its characteristic function. We say E is an Lp multiplier set iff the translation invariant operator F(Tf) = XiE F(f) (F = Fourier Transform), extends to a bounded operator on L^p (it is a-priori defined on the Schwartz Class or L^2cap L^p).
For example in dimension 1 every interval is an L^p multiplier for every p except 1 and infty.
The situation strongly differs in the 2-dimensional case, as highlighted by the solution of the ball multiplier conjecture by C. Fefferman: the ball B is a strict L^2 multiplier (not L^p for pneq 2) and the same is true for every set with an appropriate curvature.
I was wondering whether more generally something can be said about the interval of p for which E is an L^p multiplier, in terms of the "geometry" of E, in dimension 2 or higher.
Wednesday, 11 July 2007
ca.analysis and odes - L^p Idempotent multipliers in 2 dimensions
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment