Tuesday, 13 October 2015

linear algebra - Proving equality of varieties by dimension counting

For finite sets $A$ and $B$, it is clear that $A subseteq B$ and $|A| geq |B|$ implies $A = B$. While an obvious fact, it can sometimes be a nice shortcut in proofs.



Analogously, if $V$ and $W$ are finite-dimensional vector spaces such that $V subseteq W$ and $dim V geq dim W$ then $V = W$. This is an especially useful tool when $V$ is defined parametrically and $W$ is defined implicitly. Then you can easily prove $V subseteq W$ by plugging the parametric expression for $V$ into the equations for $W$. Counting the dimensions can take more work, but you sometimes get lucky.



For a while I've been wondering how this extends to algebraic varieties.



Here's an attempted application to proving the spectral theorem. Fix the dimension $n$; all matrices will be $n times n$. The theorem says that for every symmetric matrix $S$ there exists an orthogonal matrix $Q$ and a diagonal matrix $D$ such that



$$Q^T D Q = S.$$



Let $A$ and $B$ respectively denote the matrices of the form on the left-hand and right-hand side. $A$ is defined parametrically by a function $f$ from $D$ and $Q$, and $B$ is defined implicitly by the symmetry condition. We want to prove $A = B$. It is clear that $A subseteq B$:



$$(Q^T D Q)^T = Q^T D^T (Q^T)^T = Q^T D Q,$$



so $Q^T D Q$ is symmetric.



The domain of $f$ has dimension $dim D + dim Q$ where $dim D = n$ and $dim Q = (n-1) + cdots + 1$, while $S$'s space has dimension $n + (n-1) + cdots + 1$, so the dimensions seem to match.



But what about $f$'s degree of injectivity? It isn't perfectly injective: if $D$ and $D'$ equal the identity matrix then $Q^T D Q = Q'^T D' Q'$ for any independent combination of $Q$ and $Q'$.



My question is thus twofold:




What is the right generalization of the theorem for vector spaces to algebraic varieties?




and




Can the attempted proof of the spectral theorem be salvaged with a genericity argument?




I'm happy with the extant proofs of the spectral theorem, so this is more curiosity than anything else.

No comments:

Post a Comment