Friday, 27 May 2016

The lie algebra of the orthogonal group of an arbitrary space time metric

Let X ad Y be two vectors in R4, and define the inner product of X and Y as:



(X*Y) = gikXiYk (summation convention for repeated indicies)



Then we consider the 4x4 matrix g whose components are gik. I am of course interested in the case that g is NOT positive definite, because this is the situation when g represents the gravitational field in general relativity.



Let A be a 4x4 matrix which satisfies (X*Y) = (AX*AY), then I say that A is an element O(g), the orthogonal group determined by g.



I am interested in finding any sort of formula which relates the lie algebra of O(g) to the metric g.



In a previous question, it was suggested that I diagonalize the matrix g using the theorem on diagonalizing positive definite matrices. This method works nicely and gives a simple solution for the lie algebra in terms of the transformation matrix which diagonalizes g, but only when g is positive definite.



Can I still diagonalize my non positive definite g by finding the roots of the characteristic polynomial? I believe I must first somehow restrict the set of vectors I allow the inner product to work on, to avoid the case (X*Y) = 0. Nevertheless, for arguments sake let's assume that I can diagonalize g.



Let B be the transformation matrix, then I assume that I can write:



g = B-1ηB, where η is the identity matrix of signature (1,3), i.e. the metric of flat space time.



We can characterize the elements of O(g) by realizing that our inner product can be written as:



(X*Y) = XTgY



It's clear that if A is an element of O(g), then



(AX*AY) = XTATgAY = XTgY



Hence, ATgA = g



This formula can be written as gA-1g = AT, since g = g-1 explicitly.



Now applying the transformation matrix B:



gA-1g = B-1ηBA-1B-1ηB = AT, which I rearrange as:



ηBA-1B-1η = BATB-1



If by some chance (BA-1B-1)-1 = (BATB-1)T, then I can immediately conclude that A is in O(g) so long as BA-1B-1 is in O(1,3) (the group which preserves the metric η). From this step is it quite straightforward to compute the lie algebra, by taking advantage of the formula BeXB-1 = eBXB-1.



I am concerned about several steps of this procedure:



1) Is it legal to diagonalize g? I believe I need exclude any combination of vectors X, Y for which (X*Y) = 0. Since the squared norm is (X*X), then this amounts to disregarding vectors which lie along geodesic paths. Then I can deal separately for the case (X*X) > 0 and (X*X) < 0.



2) How am I supposed to deal with the condition that (BA-1B-1)-1 = (BATB-1)T? This condition seems quite restrictive.

No comments:

Post a Comment