nt.number theory - What are Mean Values of Ideal Densities in Galois Extensions?

In an unfinished (and as of now unpublished) article intended for the encyclopedia of mathematics, Arnold Scholz wrote:

"Classifying extensions according to the Galois group
of their normal closure provides us with a new point
of view. Not only the minimal discriminants but also
the mean values of the ideal densities differ considerably,
and have the following values for discriminants with large
prime factors:

• $sqrt{zeta(2)}$ for quadratic extensions;


• $sqrt[3]{zeta(3)^2}$ and $sqrt{zeta(2)}sqrt[3]{zeta(3)}$
  for a cubic extension according as it is cyclic or noncyclic;


• $sqrt{zeta(2)}sqrt{zeta(4)}$ and $sqrt{zeta(2)}^3$
  for cyclic and biquadratic quartic extensions, respectively."

I'd like to know what Scholz is talking about here. Ideal density might be some limit of the form "number of ideals with norm $le x$" / $x$, and mean value should denote some average over number fields. But what exactly is Scholz doing here?

Edit. Apparently (this is suggested by some remarks he made elsewhere), Scholz called the expression
$$ prod_p phi(p^n)/Phi_K(p) $$
the ideal density of a number field $K$, where $phi$ and $Phi_K$ denote Euler's phi function in the rationals and in $K$, respectively, and where $n$ denotes the degree
of $K$. This expression occurs in the product formula for the zeta function. I still don't know where to go from here.

As for Robin's remark on the density of fields ordered by discriminants, Scholz claimed, in a letter to Hasse dated Sept. 27, 1938, the following: The Dirichlet series
$$ G(s) = sum_{Gal(K)=G} D_K^{-s}, $$
where the sum is over all quartic fields whose normal closure has Galois group $G$, have abscissa of convergence $alpha(D)=1$, $alpha(Z) = alpha(V) = frac{1}{2}$ and
probably $alpha(S)=1$, $alpha(A)=frac{1}{2}$, where $D$, $Z$, $V$, $A$, $S$ denote
the dihedral, cyclic, four, alternating and symmetric group. Moreover,
$$ lim_{s to 1/2} frac{Z(s)}{V(s)} = 0, $$
where $Z(s)$ and $V(s)$ are the Dirichlet series defined above for $G=Z$ and $G=V$. This is all correct, as we know now, but how could Scholz have discovered (and, for $G = D$, $Z$, $V$, proved) these results in the 1930s?