I would also go for $Pi(t)$ or $t!$, but a possible reason to prefer the shifted version, $Gamma(t)$, is the following. The gamma densities $gamma_t$, $tin mathbb{R}$ defined as
$$gamma_t(x):=frac{x_+^{t-1}e^{-x}}{Gamma(t)},$$
are a convolution semigroup, so that $Gamma(t)$ appears naturally as the normalization factor of $gamma_t$. (And, of course, the semigroup relation
$$gamma_t*gamma_s=gamma_{t+s}$$
would be destroyed shifting from $t-1$ to $t$ in the definition of $gamma_t$)
Also note that the expression of the Beta function
$$B(t,s):=int_0^1 x^{t-1}(1-x)^{s-1} , dx$$
in terms of the $Gamma$ function, if shifted, would also loose the useful form
$$B(t,s)=frac{Gamma(t)Gamma(s)}{Gamma(t+s)}.$$
(incidentally note that this relation follows plainly from the semigroup property since as a general fact, the integral of a convolution of two functions is the product of their integrals).
No comments:
Post a Comment