Friday, 1 September 2006

lie algebras - Under what conditions will a unitary matrix fix a subspace which does not diagonalize the generating Hamiltonian?

OK, I think I have a comprehensive answer. Since this is physics-inspired, I'll use bra-ket notation.



First, in my comment above, you can see that if $U_{t_0}$ fixes a subspace $V_n subset V$, then $U_{t_0}$ is block diagonal:




If we write $U$ in the basis ${|v_1rangle,...,|v_Nrangle}$ and see how it acts on the basis of $V_n$, we must have the lower left block of $U$ be zero. Then, since the columns of unitary matrices form an orthonormal basis of the whole space, the columns of the upper left block of $U$ must be an orthonormal basis of $V_n$ . So, the columns of the right side of $U$ must span ${V_n}^{perp}$, so that the upper right hand block is zero.




Next, let $W:=U_{t_0}|_{V_n}$ be the upper block of $U_{t_0}$ which acts on $V_n$:



$quad U_{t_0} = \left[ begin{matrix} W & 0 \ 0 & W' end{matrix} right]$



$W$ is unitary $n times n$ matrix, and therefore can be diagonalized. Without loss of generality, assume the orthonormal vectors ${|v_1rangle,...,|v_nrangle}$ diagonalize $W$ with respective eigenvalues ${exp(i w_i t_0)}$. Also, let ${|h_1rangle,...,|h_Nrangle}$ be the orthonormal basis (in general, completely different than the $|v_irangle$) which diagonalizes $H$ with eigenvalues $h_j$.



Then, for all $i$ with $1 le i le n$,



$quad exp(i w_i t_0) = langle v_i| U_{t_0}|v_irangle = langle v_i|exp(i H t_0) |v_irangle = sum_{j=1}^N exp (i h_j t_0) |langle v_i | h_j rangle|^2 $.



After multiplying both sides by $exp(-i w_i t_0) $ we get



$quad 1 = sum_{j=1}^N exp [i (h_j-w_i) t_0] |langle v_i | h_j rangle|^2$.



Now, since ${|h_jrangle}$ is an orthonormal basis, the values $|langle v_i | h_j rangle|^2$ sum to unity (for fixed, normalized $|v_irangle$). That means all the exponentials on the rhs for which $|langle v_i | h_j rangle|^2 neq 0$ must be equal to unity. So,



$quad (h_j-w_i) frac{t_0}{2 pi} in mathbb{Z}$



and



$quad (h_j-h_{j'}) frac{t_0}{2 pi} in mathbb{Z} quad forall j,j'$ such that $langle v_i | h_j rangle $ and $ langle v_i | h_{j'} rangle neq 0$.



In other words, for all $|h_jrangle$ that have non-vanishing inner product with $|v_irangle$, the corresponding $h_j$ are separated by integer multiples of $frac{2 pi}{t_0}$.



It's easy to show that this is also a sufficient condition. Given $H$ with eigenvalues $h_j$ and any subset $mathbf{H}_{t_0} subset {h_j}$ such that for all $h_j,h_{j'} in mathbf{H}_{t_0}$,



$quad (h_j-h_{j'}) frac{t_0}{2 pi} in mathbb{Z}$



then any vector $|vrangle$ in the span of eigenvectors corresponding to $mathbf{H}_{t_0}$ will be an eigenvector of $U_{t_0} = exp(i H t_0)$ with eigenvalue $exp(i h_j t_0)$ (which is the same for all $h_j in mathbf{H}_{t_0}$).



(Everything below is old)



Example (Old)



Still not an answer, but here's a simple but non-trivial example:



Let $U_t$ be the family of unitaries acting on $C^3$ which spatially rotate $R^3$ about the vector $(1,1,0)$ with period $T=2pi$. Let $t_0 = T/2=pi$. Then in the standard basis,



$quad H = frac{i}{sqrt{2}}left[ begin{matrix} 0 & 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 & -1 \ -1 & 1 & 0 end{matrix} right] quad ,$



$quad U_{t_0/2} = frac{1}{2}left[ begin{matrix} 1 & 1 & -sqrt{2} \ 1 & 1 & sqrt{2} \ sqrt{2} & -sqrt{2} & 0 end{matrix} right]quad , quad U_{t_0} = left[ begin{matrix} 0 & 1 & 0 \ 1 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 1 end{matrix} right] quad , quad U_{T} = I,$



so $U_{t_0}V_2 = V_2$, where $V_2 = mathrm{span}{(1,0,0),(0,1,0)}$. The eigenbasis is ${(1,-1,-isqrt{2}),(1,-1,isqrt{2}),(1,1,0)}$ with respective eigenvalues ${1,-1,0}$ for $H$.



Note that $H$ and $U_{t_0 /2}$ are not block diagonal in the standard basis, but $U_{t_0}$ is. In particular, no subset of the eigenvectors of $H$ form an orthonormal basis of $V_2$.



Commutation (Old)



I think the confusion over when you can infer that $H$ is block diagonal comes from the non-uniqueness of matrix roots. Positive matrices have unique positive roots, of course, but unitary matricies do not have unique unitary roots. For example, the $2 times 2$ identity matrix has itself and



$quad left[ begin{matrix} 0 & 1 \ 1 & 0 end{matrix} right]$



as square roots, but only the latter mixes the first and second rows. Likewise, I suspect that all non-trivial cases of unitaries fixing subspaces (where non-trivial is defined by Michael Underwood above) will have $t_0$ exactly such that non-degenerate eigenvectors of $H$ are degenerate for $U_{t_0}$.

No comments:

Post a Comment